From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 31 06:18:33 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1497016A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 06:18:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fafoe.narf.at (chello212186121237.14.vie.surfer.at
	[212.186.121.237])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA5B43D2F
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 06:18:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at)
Received: from wombat.fafoe.narf.at (wombat.fafoe.narf.at [192.168.1.42])
	by fafoe.narf.at (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8108A40EE; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:18:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wombat.fafoe.narf.at (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id EBEA11AC; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:18:25 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:18:25 +0100
From: Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.narf.at>
To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
Message-ID: <20031231141546.GC595@wombat.fafoe.narf.at>
Mail-Followup-To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>,
	Mark Huizer <freebsd+current@dohd.org>, current@freebsd.org
References: <20031231130800.GB59239@eeyore.local.dohd.org>
	<200312311421.25383.max@love2party.net>
	<20031231132651.GC59239@eeyore.local.dohd.org>
	<200312311441.23719.max@love2party.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200312311441.23719.max@love2party.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern.osreldate and EAI_NODATA deprecation
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:18:33 -0000

On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 02:41:23PM +0100, Max Laier wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 December 2003 14:26, Mark Huizer wrote:
> >
> > Well, that's tougher, since EAI_NODATA is defined (it's defined to be
> > EAI_NODATA).
> > Hmm...
> > would this work? I'm not too 100% secure about preprocessing stuff.
> > If this should work, I could try to get it included in the normal kaffe
> > tree.
> >
> > #if defined(EAI_NODATA) && EAI_NODATA != EAI_NONAME
> > ...
> > #endif
> 
> Other question, does it hurt you that EAI_NODATA == EAI_NONAME? I'd not think 
> so ... so why borther?! But yes, the syntax is okay ... consider extra 
> parentheses for the second expression.

Eg. it does matter if both macros occur in case labels of a switch
statement.

Regards,
Stefan Farfeleder