From owner-freebsd-afs Mon Dec 15 10:25:44 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA22068 for afs-outgoing; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 10:25:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-afs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from phoenix.its.rpi.edu (dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu [128.113.161.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA21390 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 10:20:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu) Received: from localhost (dec@localhost) by phoenix.its.rpi.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA06340; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 13:20:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 13:20:07 -0500 (EST) From: "David E. Cross" To: John Robert LoVerso cc: freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What to call ourselves? In-Reply-To: <199712151719.MAA28370@postman.opengroup.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Mon, 15 Dec 1997, John Robert LoVerso wrote: > Sys names have historically been "arch_system". I.e., See this (dated, but > accurate) file: /afs/transarc.com/service/systypes > Hmm... that seems to be changing; the solarisx86 verision of AFS is 'sunx86_54' (which IMO is a much cleaner, more concise way of doing things.) This is more FYI, since I have no intetnion of attempting to buck the trend of 'i386_fbsd22' -- David Cross