From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Dec  7 15:18:49 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA01897
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 15:18:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA01875
          Thu, 7 Dec 1995 15:18:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id PAA07038; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 15:18:36 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id PAA06371; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 15:19:23 -0800
Message-Id: <199512072319.PAA06371@corbin.Root.COM>
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: root@buffnet.net, jau@jau.csc.fi, questions@freebsd.org,
        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Any operational code using mmap() on FreeBSD ? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 07 Dec 95 16:13:30 MST."
             <199512072313.QAA07409@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 1995 15:19:22 -0800
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>> >The question is what are the failure modes on 2.1.  If there aren't any,
>> >you should upgrade to resolve the problem.  If there are, and they are
>> >more severe, you should report them to be corrected, since 2.1 *is*
>> >being maintained (in the form of the 2.2-current).
>> 
>>    Uh, actually, 2.1 is being maintained seperately from 2.2-current.
>
>Really?!?
>
>Man, I thought that there was an announcement saying there wouldn't be
>a 2.1.1.  Not the first time I've been wrong...

   Huh? You were hulicinating when yow saw that. We have always planned a
follow-on to 2.1 on the 2.1 branch.

-DG