From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 24 20:11:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E402DD for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 20:11:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdavidlists@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com (mail-ie0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E32A2113 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 20:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c10so2929091ieb.3 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 13:11:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=oHeuyKN2+xfBR4dMDwOxFZ/6IWo+RGl3vDWvgI+Y8zE=; b=yENuXVdkx9dOzZPIyHzWTxFH7LSQApCq8b233ApZZ29MInhyeBNSNqrv5MzdKVSBaA McyS22N3qor9cb0WrG8R5KMU3mAL7w4pqQGKTwGHkk6ivkICNGK/vQ4vHyzRNBClpU4B dhe11e+LafFqbu8nhiTuec9dnzS8gw4ypOuc0Jl5JfxZeEvgqRO9GBbnANMQEeIPnt/2 EalmfXzXUm7RS37H9r7yhMWlCotezEH0X4OYn1nNYjLRBzsE9St0eEXIUS9b7FegL+sz t7JaOEDXzUKVI9tnmnRs3wspukNZHN/mXwJZQbYMtkqUfD/R2np3juWD26NYkC4p1CvQ VYkg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.52.129 with SMTP id j1mr3451253icg.5.1377375069756; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 13:11:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jdavidlists@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.150.196 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 13:11:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130824193814.GR4972@kib.kiev.ua> References: <158996730.12825374.1377265437471.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> <20130824174103.GQ4972@kib.kiev.ua> <20130824193814.GR4972@kib.kiev.ua> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:11:09 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: tbiaxdli98Baa5vW4060O87U6mI Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS deadlock on 9.2-Beta1 From: J David To: Konstantin Belousov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Rick Macklem , freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 20:11:11 -0000 On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > No, at least not without reverting the r254754 first. The IGN_SBUSY patch > is not critical there. There is lots of other stuff in r250907 / reverted by r254754. Some of it looks important for sendfile() performance. If testing this extensively in the next few days could help get that work back into 9.2 we are happy to do it, but if it's too late then we can leave it for those on stable/9. Thanks!