From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 3 17:04:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA256106564A for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 17:04:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83EE58FC17 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 17:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwp14 with SMTP id 14so2285950wwp.31 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:04:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=x3hIqMt1J5NxNR2QUhAqYUojv/TRX2HW8I+vBI4hBv8=; b=fYIENQZZImLnjm/2GoN8/PNImk66mr9SSgIEbgJ2G4zoRwnocGoFquwX+clT4kYmol zELyvJSOc8MB9KqNoWPXXP/Wkh5eTpeYM3EAeUDcIaaThJWOM7ZlPFaqRcc1r5KYT3aR XPrEPt6bp0jT9c0Du7CmueQetdpkbtmHfmTuo= Received: by 10.227.208.149 with SMTP id gc21mr12988162wbb.10.1320339890195; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:04:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.162.132 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 10:04:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20111103104713.7746a954.web@3dresearch.com> From: Christer Solskogen Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 18:04:28 +0100 Message-ID: To: Alejandro Imass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Janos Dohanics Subject: Re: postfix INST_BASE option X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:04:52 -0000 On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Janos Dohanics wrote: >> Could you comment on the pros and cons of using INST_BASE=on in postfix >> on a production server? >> > > Great question! I know there has been some discussion to be able to > choose your base MTA upon install but I don't know how far this has > gone. > I don't use that option but rather install it as a regular port, > register it in mailer.conf when it asks you to and then do this in > your rc.conf > > sendmail_enable="NO" > sendmail_submit_enable="NO" > sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" > sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" > postfix_enable="YES" > You can do this a lot easier with just: sendmail_enable="NONE" postfix_enable="YES" -- chs,