From owner-cvs-ports Sat Apr 19 02:50:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA06579 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 02:50:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA06573; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 02:50:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id EAA00359; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 04:50:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from sjx-ca35-05.ix.netcom.com(204.31.236.133) by dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id sma000176; Sat Apr 19 04:50:03 1997 Received: (from asami@localhost) by blimp.mimi.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) id CAA01421; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 02:49:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 02:49:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199704190949.CAA01421@blimp.mimi.com> To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au CC: obrien@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199704190854.SAA29756@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> (message from Michael Smith on Sat, 19 Apr 1997 18:24:06 +0930 (CST)) Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/staroffice Makefile From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * > Display pkg/MESSAGE for port users (as apposed to package users). * * Is this the "right" way to do this, or should it be done by bsd.port.mk? * (Asking for my own reference) As a policy, bsd.port.mk doesn't run any of the scripts in pkg/ during installation. There are too many of them, some of which run twice, and there just aren't enough hooks in the framework to put them in. Also it's sometimes not obvious exactly when they should be run (there are already so many things done in _PORT_USE). Satoshi