From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 12 01:51:46 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F00CBF7;
 Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:51:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F31C6B4;
 Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:51:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sBC1llXj035643;
 Fri, 12 Dec 2014 04:48:17 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 04:47:47 +0300 (MSK)
From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Frequency of FreeBSD package builds
In-Reply-To: <77E4DBD49647EB45C3CF72B7@atuin.in.mat.cc>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1412120443280.73005@woozle.rinet.ru>
References: <548428C7.2050800@club-internet.fr>
 <307D7D309A871FC7AB3405E1@ogg.in.absolight.net>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1412120154120.73005@woozle.rinet.ru>
 <77E4DBD49647EB45C3CF72B7@atuin.in.mat.cc>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet
X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 04:48:17 +0300 (MSK)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org,
 =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Juan_Ram=F3n_Molina_Menor?= <listjm@club-internet.fr>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:51:46 -0000

Mat,

On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, Mathieu Arnold wrote:

> | Am I right supposing that each build is a full one?  What are the
> | downsides of  incremental builds which should take less than, say, 2 days
> | (if not deepest  beats like gettext updates involved)?
> 
> No, it is incremental builds, for all port versions of FreeBSD except
> CURRENT, because ABI change often, and it's safer to just rebuild
> everything everytime.

> Right now, there are two boxes, one for amd64 and one for i386, and the
> build order is the current quarterly branch for 9 and then 10, then head
> for 10, 9, CURRENT and 8.  Also, when there is a security advisory or

[snip all the very detailed explanaition]

Thank you, and all of portmanager team, very much to bring us full up-to-date 
packages besides all the whole debris you've just described! ;-P

Seriously, pretty much of work. Thank you again.


-- 
Sincerely,
D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
[ FreeBSD committer:                                 marck@FreeBSD.org ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------