From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 09:29:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44DB2811 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 191A31B93 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:29:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C25343BB3; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 04:28:59 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <534512CB.5030109@marino.st> Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:28:43 +0200 From: John Marino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Big Lebowski , Tijl Coosemans Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion References: <5344005C.4030503@aldan.algebra.com> <20140408185537.69d5cd6e@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <53442E10.6060907@aldan.algebra.com> <20140409002033.5a2d9850@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Mikhail T." , freebsd-ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 09:29:20 -0000 On 4/9/2014 11:22, Big Lebowski wrote: > While we are not having any way to measure ports usage (or am I wrong > here?), we're still building packages from ports, and I would hope that we > could get some statistics of pkg usage for certain packages from official > repositories, could we? This is not exactly direct relationship for the > port being used but I would think that such knowledge is better than none. How do you distinguish packages downloaded by mirrors versus those downloaded by pkg? At DragonFly, we'd love to know how to do this because it always comes up when the "it's kill to kill i386 platform" discussion comes up. Every time somebody brings up a statistic about how many times packages are download (or what % packages downloaded are i386) then the very next questions is: are those legitimate downloads. > As a sidenote, perhaps its the time to introduce some sort of package/ports > usage data gathering to FreeBSD just like Debian/Ubuntu are doing it, that > would be anonymous and optional? Maybe pkg adds some unique variable to the download URL. If not, it could, and statistics could be tracked that way by analyzing the web server logs. John