From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 1 07:00:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5614616A41B for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outQ.internet-mail-service.net (outQ.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1A113C455 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from mx0.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.32.160) by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:00:28 -0800 Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123B3127078; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:00:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47A2C38B.7050804@elischer.org> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:00:27 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Eischen References: <47A21ED6.5070303@elischer.org> <47A25206.6070406@delphij.net> <47A25993.6050200@elischer.org> <47A25CED.4010504@delphij.net> <47A26D12.30205@elischer.org> <47A27AF3.2020701@delphij.net> <47A27C08.3010709@elischer.org> <47A28023.9000105@delphij.net> <47A290E7.4040900@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: d@delphij.net, FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: needs a tester with an SMP 7.0 box X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:00:29 -0000 Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> Xin LI wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>>>> I'm not sure why, but a fresh RELENG_7_0 with your patch, plus DDB >>>>> enabled does not trigger the problem :-/ >>>>> >>>> what happens without the patch? >>> >>> No, I mean that it used to crash with previous kernel which is built >>> only a couple of days ago, no more than a week. You want me to test the >>> case without patch? >>> >> >> We need to detirmine >> 1/ whether there is a problem in 7.0 in the first place. if not, we >> are done. >> >> 2/ whether the patch fixes it if there is a problem. > > I think it's safe to say that it _is_ a potential problem in both > -current, 7.0 and 6.x. I committed it to -current without trying > to duplicate the problem. yes but 7.0 is in countdown where -current isn't >