From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan  7 19:26:29 1996
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA07172
          for stable-outgoing; Sun, 7 Jan 1996 19:26:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA07165
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 7 Jan 1996 19:26:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA21422; Sun, 7 Jan 1996 19:26:02 -0800
To: bugs@freebsd.netcom.com (Mark Hittinger)
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Do we want to bring the BSDI 2.x compat code in? (fwd) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 07 Jan 1996 19:41:45 CST."
             <199601080141.TAA07105@freebsd.netcom.com> 
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 1996 19:26:02 -0800
Message-ID: <21420.821071562@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> Yes.  Is it in 2.2?  If so this reduces it priority in my view.  I'm not
> sure that us "outer" guys have a clear picture of the plans for -current
> now.  

No, this would be in 2.1.1 (if it were 2.2, I'd be discussing this in
the -current mailing list :-).

> Maybe its time for a FreeBSD con with sessions and stuff.

I certainly wouldn't mind!  For those of us fortunate to get to USENIX
every year, that's sort of been the `FreeBSD con' up to now.

					Jordan