From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 15:29:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCC816A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:29:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from grant.org (grant.org [206.190.173.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860E543D5D for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:29:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mgrant@grant.org) Received: from grant.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grant.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0RNT3eG016591 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:29:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mgrant@grant.org) Received: (from mgrant@localhost) by grant.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id i0RNT3IA016590 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:29:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mgrant) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:29:03 -0500 From: Michael Grant To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040127232903.GJ95621@grant.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: devfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:29:50 -0000 I just installed freebsd 5.2. I have 2 disks, both the same. I am pretty sure they're both dangerously dedicated (henceforth dd). Sysinstall made my first disk da0s1, but the second disk (which already had a root and swap on it from an older 5.1 install) came up as simply da1. So things look like this: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0s1a 32933964 2219976 28079272 7% / devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev /dev/da1a 32933964 1494196 28805052 5% /mnt I know it's just esthetics, but how do I get da0s1a to be da0a in the context of 5.x's devfs? Since this is a dd partition, there really shouldn't be a "s1" in the name in my oppinion. Michael Grant