From owner-cvs-all  Sun Feb 27  8:13:46 2000
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from freebsd.dk (freebsd.dk [212.242.42.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C10F737B5BE; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 08:13:38 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sos@freebsd.dk)
Received: (from sos@localhost)
	by freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.1) id RAA43235;
	Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:13:31 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from sos)
From: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>
Message-Id: <200002271613.RAA43235@freebsd.dk>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata ata-all.c
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002271450520.8714-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com> from Doug Rabson at "Feb 27, 2000 02:52:09 pm"
To: dfr@nlsystems.com (Doug Rabson)
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:13:31 +0100 (CET)
Cc: sos@FreeBSD.org (Sren Schmidt), cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

It seems Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Sren Schmidt wrote:
> 
> > sos         2000/02/27 04:41:08 PST
> > 
> >   Modified files:
> >     sys/dev/ata          ata-all.c 
> >   Log:
> >   Fix the problem that caused the boot to fail when modules were loaded.
> >   
> >   Real braino, confuses two different softc types, I wonder how this
> >   could ever work :(
> 
> Actually, it was confusing two devclasses and ended up with ata_devclass
> pointing at "atapci". This meant that lookups using ata_devclass returned
> devices like atapci0 instead of ata0 and things went downhill fast...

That was what I meant but unclearly formulated. I still wonder how
this could work :|

-Søren


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message