From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 20 06:24:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794FD1065670 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 06:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A429F8FC12 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 06:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id JAA19334 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 09:24:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1OQDxM-000HvH-Mg for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 09:24:36 +0300 Message-ID: <4C1DB423.4050002@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 09:24:35 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100603) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org References: <4C1C7686.3050206@freebsd.org> <20100619143920.GM3632@acme.spoerlein.net> <4C1CF14C.8080108@freebsd.org> <20100619214125.GO3632@acme.spoerlein.net> In-Reply-To: <20100619214125.GO3632@acme.spoerlein.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: KDB_TRACE in GENERIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 06:24:39 -0000 on 20/06/2010 00:41 Ulrich Spörlein said the following: > > Enabling textdumps should be the next step, once we deem them stable > enough to unleash them on unexpecting users. I agree. Note that this will require functional dump device, and for some reason (that is beyond my understanding) we don't have dumpdev="AUTO" in releases and stable branches (it's "NO" there). -- Andriy Gapon