From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 19:38:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 665CC885; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 19:38:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DE4C15C6; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 19:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s39JccUZ000779 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Apr 2014 13:38:38 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) with ESMTP id s39Jcb2s000776; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 13:38:37 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 13:38:37 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Melvyn Sopacua Subject: Re: Repair pkgng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <534527D6.5000802@marino.st> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 09 Apr 2014 13:38:38 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Kevin Oberman , marino@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports mailing list , Jakob Breivik Grimstveit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 19:38:41 -0000 On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > Hi, > > So, after the detour... > > >>> On 4/9/2014 12:38, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > >>>> Though it makes no sense in my mind. Distfiles belong to ports not >>>> packages. What problem was solved by moving this? > > This still doesn't make sense. Distfiles are of no concern to binary > packages, so why would I continue to clutter /var/db/pkg with a large > tree of directories that is then duplicated to /var/db/ports? portmaster creates a file in /var/db/pkg/portnamedistfiles. It's not a directory, just a list of distfiles used by the port and their checksums.