From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 19 03:23:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CBC1065673 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 03:23:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F1E8FC13 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 03:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id p6J3NSHM028311 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:23:28 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:23:28 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201107190323.p6J3NSHM028311@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4e251dd1.NwFJIRUr/aDWf3yX%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Subject: Re: Tools to find "unlegal" files ( videos , music etc ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 03:23:47 -0000 > Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 23:01:53 -0700 > From: perryh@pluto.rain.com > Subject: Re: Tools to find "unlegal" files ( videos , music etc ) > > Robert Bonomi wrote: > > > > All well and good for locating files of a certain format and/or > with particular content, but it doesn't address the question of > whether a specific copy is "legal", i.e. did the user who put it > there have the legal right to put it there? {{ Noting that the troll contributed nothing constructive to the OP's problem, _or_ to dealing with the pseudo-issue he raises. }} Obviously the ankle-biter was incapable of reading the ACTUAL REQUEST the OP made: "Anyone knows an utility that I could pipe to the "find" command in order to detect video, music, games ... etc files ? I need a tool that could "inspect" inside files because many users rename those filename to "inoffensive" ones :-)" NOTE WELL that the OP was _smart_enough_ -- unlike the prior poster -- to ask about something that _can_ be done mechanically. Furthermore, it was _explicit_ in the actual suggestion that it only produced a list possible 'suspects' -- It did _not_ provide any indication of status -- 'legal', or otherwise.