From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 18:09:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CE916A4CE; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:09:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA3D43D54; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:09:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 3C68B148AB; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:08:04 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:08:04 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: karl@akheller.net In-Reply-To: <200407011705.i61H5Gn11514@darktower.akheller.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: mita@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsdb -Uu failure from tkscanfax X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 18:09:54 -0000 On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Karl Heller wrote: > Now, granted I don't have /usr/ports/any_language_other_than_english. > So does this mean I don't qualify "(INDEX builds are not supported > with partial or out-of-date ports collections)." There are ports elsewhere in the tree that have dependencies upon japanese/*. I personally consider this counterintuitive, however, the fix would involve numerous repocopies and a great deal of work. So, yes, japanese is not an optional category. If you leave it out, your INDEX builds will break. mcl