From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 28 18:39:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from luke.cpl.net (luke.cpl.net [209.150.92.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC4115010 for ; Fri, 28 May 1999 18:39:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shawn@luke.cpl.net) Received: (from shawn@localhost) by luke.cpl.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA09574; Fri, 28 May 1999 18:40:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19990528184016.A5994@cpl.net> Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 18:40:16 -0700 From: Shawn Ramsey To: Doug White Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Cisco Catalyst 2926 References: <19990528155035.B794@cpl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i In-Reply-To: ; from Doug White on Fri, May 28, 1999 at 04:32:46PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Has anyone had any trouble getting the mentioned switch working with Intel > > EtherExpress PRO/100+ or B cards working? I've tried locking the port at > > 100/Full duplex and the card, and it still won't work. Kingston KNE110 cards > > which are the majority of the cards we use, work fine in auto. Any ideas? > > Ciscos are touchy. Force the speed and full-duplex mode on both ends. dg > should have some anecdotal data on these. Turns out it was a cable. Ugh. :) That was the first EtherExpress that was put on it, so I assumed it was something besides a cable. And the cable was working previously on a 10 BaseT hub. But no ports have had to be forced to 100/full duplex... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message