From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 30 09:01:50 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ACAD16A41A; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:01:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13FE313C459; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:01:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6U91fAh089714; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 02:01:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) with ESMTP id l6U91fSv089711; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 02:01:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 02:01:41 -0700 (PDT) From: mjacob@freebsd.org To: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <20070730.025750.41720145.imp@bsdimp.com> Message-ID: <20070730020001.H89679@ns1.feral.com> References: <20070729214715.I31116@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20070729160246.A86779@ns1.feral.com> <86zm1ejrat.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20070730.025750.41720145.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, bz@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, mjacob@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet tcp_input.c tcp_usrreq.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mjacob@freebsd.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:01:50 -0000 On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Warner Losh wrote: >> mjacob@freebsd.org writes: >>> All of these statements seem to cancel each other out or are >>> incorrec. I consider the subject closed as it is compiling a universe >>> run right now. >> >> Famous last words. >> >> As I've said far too many times before, 'make universe' is worthless. >> >> Now will you please fix this properly? > > Thank you for your opinion. However, make universe is not worthless. > If doing one, and checking the output for errors, isn't sufficient to > get tinderbox to not whine, then tinderbox is broken. Particularly since tinderbox is difficult to use (at least for me). Look -this is in some senses all of a side issue to getting this fixed. I've asked RE to let me check in a change and hopefully we can move on and then I'll try and figure out the latest ports version of tinderbox and see if it actually does what I need quicker.