From owner-freebsd-alpha Sun Jun 27 14:40: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from arc.hq.cti.ru (arc.hq.cti.ru [195.34.40.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967AC14C0B for ; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 14:40:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by arc.hq.cti.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id BAA36097; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 01:39:40 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru) Received: from tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA03092; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 01:41:29 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru) Message-Id: <199906272141.BAA03092@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: Peter Wemm Cc: Dmitrij Tejblum , Doug Rabson , alpha@FreeBSD.ORG From: Dmitrij Tejblum Subject: Re: Hmm!! In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 28 Jun 1999 04:50:02 +0800." <19990627205002.0C7CB81@overcee.netplex.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 01:41:29 +0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Peter Wemm wrote: > I went a bit further and it seems to have fixed my mystery problems: One line in your program completely change its behavior, and you claim several lines in the kernel fix it? ;-) Cool! ;-) > [...] > I'm pretty sure this is overkill, but it doesn't seem to hurt so far. I > have not tried your single patch though, I got out the sledgehammer to see > if I could get some sanity. I'm not sure if the alpha_pal_tbi() functions > do an implied imb as well or not. If so, then the first chunks are > irrelevant. I don't think so. While your patch is overkill, it still seem to miss imb in pmap_enter_quick()... Dima > > Cheers, > -Peter > -- > Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message