From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 15 08:12:01 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3FA16A41A for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:12:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D3D13C461 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IhKmz-00065f-AL for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:55:01 -0700 Message-ID: <13208310.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:55:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Atrox To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: silver.salonen@gmail.com Subject: Bacula wx-console's wx version X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:12:01 -0000 Hi! Does anyone see a reason why Bacula's wx-console should use WX 2.4? Every time I start upgrading bacula-client, I just set "USE_WX=2.8" in bacula-server's Makefile and it builds and works perfectly. I've also tried compiling it with 2.6 and there wasn't any problem with it neither. So what do you think - is the 2.4 really necessary there or would the WX-defaults suffice? -- Silver -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bacula-wx-console%27s-wx-version-tf4625066.html#a13208310 Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.