From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 07:25:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 739D742B for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 07:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay006.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay006.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128291D0D for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 07:25:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqEGAORGRlNbsJU2/2dsb2JhbABZgwbCK4MOgR0XdIIlAQEBBDocIxALDgoJJQ8qHgaIEwHMOheObAeEOAEDmF2SQ4MyOw Received: from 54.149-176-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.176.149.54]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 10 Apr 2014 09:25:01 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s3A7P0Cf000976; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:25:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:24:59 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Christian Weisgerber Subject: Re: XMMS options and plugins Message-ID: <20140410092459.25e93c06@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 07:25:11 -0000 On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 20:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Finally, who uses XMMS's RUSXMMS_PATCHES option? These patches are > very intrusive and getting rid of them would simplify the port. If you decide to keep them then maybe also restore the russian/xmms slave port.