From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jun 21 10:19:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA10287 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 10:19:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [204.178.32.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA10282 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 10:19:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (spork@localhost) by super-g.inch.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA10420; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 13:32:37 GMT Date: Sat, 21 Jun 1997 13:32:37 +0000 (GMT) From: spork X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com To: Ben Black cc: Jaye Mathisen , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenBSD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I was trolling comp.unix.security a few times, and his attitude kind of frightened me. I appreciate that he's a hard worker, but everything turned personal on that group... Charles On Thu, 19 Jun 1997, Ben Black wrote: > the security fixes are real. unfortunately, few people can deal with > theo deraadt, so step lightly on the openbsd lists. > > On Thu, 19 Jun 1997, Jaye Mathisen wrote: > > > > > > > Sheesh, how many people do they have working on that thing? I was reading > > the 2.1 release announcement, and shaking my head... > > > > Of course, the "20 or more security fixes", w/o mentioning subsystems was > > amusing. (Not doubting that they were fixed, only the tossing around of > > unsubstantiated numbers). > > > > Anybody running FreeBSD given it a shot just to see? I have been > > thinking about it to see if it fixes my UFS problems that are seemingly > > unrepairable. > > >