From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 25 19:20:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D835716A46E for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:20:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outF.internet-mail-service.net (outF.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF83013C46C for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:20:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from mx0.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.32.160) by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:20:01 -0700 Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (nat.ironport.com [63.251.108.100]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25EA125A23; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:20:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46801566.2080706@elischer.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:20:06 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Macintosh/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Danny Braniss References: <467FF435.6050108@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KSE was Re: open/close/ioctl api change? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:20:02 -0000 Danny Braniss wrote: >> Danny Braniss wrote: >>>> actually it's the struct thread *tp where my problems are, >>>> this code works fine under 6.2, and did work till some days ago under current. >>>> >>>> static int >>>> iscsi_open(struct cdev *dev, int flags, int otype, struct thread *td) >>>> { >>>> ... >>>> debug(3, "td->td_proc=%p", td->td_proc); >>>> debug(3, "td->td_proc->p_pid=%d pid=%d", >>>> td->td_proc->p_pid, curproc->p_pid); >>>> ... >>>> >>>> the first debug prints out td->td_proc=0 and the next one panics. >>> found the problem, 'option KSE' which is defined now in DEFAULTS, >>> and i'm compiling a module! which does not include DEFAULTS! >>> >> even so it shouldnt' happen.. >> > why? I'm compiling outside the source tree. > I agree that it shouldn't, specially, since it took me a long > time to find the problem :-), but I can't see how config options > can be exported. Unless, the make file is made aware of the KERNCONF file. there should be no place in the source at any time where a thread that is not on the free list could have a td_proc of NULL. it doesn't matter about where a module came from etc.. the fact that it happened is a bug somewhere. > > danny >