From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 17:10:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16EC859F; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:10:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 768C71AAD; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:10:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id x13so4297025wgg.14 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:10:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=VLzzszLQt/3+9RHjCieWRQQzk1lJZZwEbPwdJk1ouPM=; b=nkGdcsiL760MNKp20Mz2BcdrFwcxTqAyywvBky62crXNQjF1Vw3PwBsgMr5Tt4swei BsKJbW+CQ/vSbRCZI6pc+vqyxeC7Rg+Wx96tNLz2EoYnCCXAt6QEtb7P6rc4/hRU3jz1 r1q/q4Fomc7CuJm2yN5nlVOnVYjzd8mzy6s6CwP8gTewFlWToZNNduPJSj6Usofm++wi +TCh0ACc+SHnKR1Nm3sluXbEDFCTqC8aU7Rm3XEsVXqhmbLBh8/2RxOuptlBPsgO69aD w5p0XN1L2NCYtlzgLkwFJoIP+K1v6sW6oPquUWr7YGzYErcCmhH0Urv+rsF3M2714yUm Kr+A== X-Received: by 10.180.206.48 with SMTP id ll16mr15957489wic.57.1397149840812; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:10:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n5sm12175888wiz.1.2014.04.10.10.10.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:10:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 19:10:37 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: marino@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion Message-ID: <20140410171037.GJ8207@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <5344005C.4030503@aldan.algebra.com> <20140408185537.69d5cd6e@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <53442E10.6060907@aldan.algebra.com> <20140409002033.5a2d9850@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <534512CB.5030109@marino.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Re2uCLPLNzqOLVJA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <534512CB.5030109@marino.st> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Big Lebowski , Tijl Coosemans , "Mikhail T." , freebsd-ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:10:43 -0000 --Re2uCLPLNzqOLVJA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:28:43AM +0200, John Marino wrote: > On 4/9/2014 11:22, Big Lebowski wrote: > > While we are not having any way to measure ports usage (or am I wrong > > here?), we're still building packages from ports, and I would hope that= we > > could get some statistics of pkg usage for certain packages from offici= al > > repositories, could we? This is not exactly direct relationship for the > > port being used but I would think that such knowledge is better than no= ne. >=20 > How do you distinguish packages downloaded by mirrors versus those > downloaded by pkg? At DragonFly, we'd love to know how to do this > because it always comes up when the "it's kill to kill i386 platform" > discussion comes up. Every time somebody brings up a statistic about > how many times packages are download (or what % packages downloaded are > i386) then the very next questions is: are those legitimate downloads. >=20 >=20 > > As a sidenote, perhaps its the time to introduce some sort of package/p= orts > > usage data gathering to FreeBSD just like Debian/Ubuntu are doing it, t= hat > > would be anonymous and optional? >=20 > Maybe pkg adds some unique variable to the download URL. If not, it > could, and statistics could be tracked that way by analyzing the web > server logs. >=20 The useragent for pkg is pkg/version :D Exactly for that purpose regards, Bapt --Re2uCLPLNzqOLVJA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlNG0I0ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExrRACgrU6G64JTuCgYX9kaEn+M06kF YHAAoJlJPSjcXxe+Ap+Pyg5p/Ax3/sgK =ilnO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Re2uCLPLNzqOLVJA--