From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Aug 23 09:43:58 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA09161 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:43:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arf.cs.sunyit.edu (arf.cs.sunyit.edu [192.52.220.99]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA09139; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:43:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from chuck@localhost) by arf.cs.sunyit.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA05605; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 12:14:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 12:14:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Charles Green Message-Id: <199608231614.MAA05605@arf.cs.sunyit.edu> X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: hackers@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Dumb question about SCO compat Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Quite awhile back I heard someone mention that at one point they had a large subset of SCO running under the SCO (ibcs2) compat on a FreeBSD system. I also believe that he was using the shared libs scarfed off of a SCO system. (Finally to the question!) How possible is that now if I were to order the SCO Free* OpenServer and used those libs? I'm curious as to how much that would help in attempting to run something like SCO's oracle, word perfect, etc. -- Charles Green, PRC Inc. Rome Laboratory, NY