From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 2 08:20:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AF716A427 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 08:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (jojo.ms-net.de [84.16.236.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B8C43D55 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 08:20:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (p54A5E0DB.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.224.219]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k328Iawv000394; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 10:18:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) by Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k328K8FO031375; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 10:20:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 10:20:08 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Gerald Pfeifer Message-ID: <20060402102008.3c6d1396@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: References: <200604010014.k310EfbR089078@freefall.freebsd.org> <25452314@bs2.sp34.ru> <20060402004306.69646824@Magellan.Leidinger.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.16; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, intron@intron.ac Subject: Re: [emulation] ports/95158: The port linux_base-fc3 misses two fundamental packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 08:20:20 -0000 Am Sun, 2 Apr 2006 01:34:30 +0200 (CEST) schrieb Gerald Pfeifer : > > AFAIK this needs kernel support, which we don't have. But this is just a > > wild guess at midnight, it may be wrong... > > I believe you are right. The one thing I do not know is whether > applications linked against libselinux, or libselinux itself, will > fail graciously in case kernel support is missing. If this is the > case, it might make sense to include it even if, obviously, we do > not have the kernel support. What about waiting until someone complains or asks questions? Bye, Alexander. -- Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach him to use the Net and he won't bother you for weeks. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 WL http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/registry/1FZ4DTHQE9PQ8/ref=wl_em_to/