From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 6 12:13:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CF0106566B; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitry@andric.com) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741C28FC15; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:f057:b5cb:d8a2:a766] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:f057:b5cb:d8a2:a766]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 389BC5C43; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:13:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B447E67.3090307@andric.com> Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:13:27 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2b6pre) Gecko/20100103 Lanikai/3.1a1pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= References: <65036.1262386032@critter.freebsd.dk> <201001020101.16450.pieter@degoeje.nl> <86637fjypj.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4B44702B.9090503@FreeBSD.org> <4B4473B6.7030902@andric.com> <86skajihu3.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86skajihu3.fsf@ds4.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Alexander Motin , Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Thomas Backman , Poul-Henning Kamp , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Pieter de Goeje Subject: Re: File system blocks alignment X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:13:25 -0000 On 2010-01-06 12:38, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: >> Yep, Windows 7 seems to align its partitions on 1 MiB by default... Th= ey >> were always proponents of wasting your disk space for you. :) > There are many reasons to criticize Microsoft and their products, but > this is not one of them. I was just kidding, of course. This alignment been chosen deliberately, since it should nicely encompass all stripe sizes supported by RAID controllers. And no need to ask the underlying device for its stripe or chunk size...