From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug  3 21:50:13 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF7E16A419
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  3 Aug 2007 21:50:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru)
Received: from mail.kuban.ru (mail.kuban.ru [62.183.66.246])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1794713C46A
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  3 Aug 2007 21:50:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru)
Received: from bsam.ru ([85.172.12.174])
	by mail.kuban.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id l73LTxGb095507
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 01:30:10 +0400 (MSD)
Received: (from bsam@localhost)
	by bsam.ru (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l73LUFVs001717;
	Sat, 4 Aug 2007 01:30:15 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru)
X-Authentication-Warning: bsam.ru: bsam set sender to bsam@ipt.ru using -f
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 01:30:05 +0400
Message-ID: <52921778@bsam.ru>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: ldconfig when PACKAGE_BUILDING=YES (and linux ports)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 21:50:13 -0000

Hi!


Seems that running ldconfig while building a package at package
cluster (i.e. when PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined) is quite useless. [1]

To be more specific I'm interested at linux ports. ATM we run linux
ldconfig (using linuxulator) _at package building_. Hence to create a
package for FC6 port we should change compat.linux.osrelease (which I
don't like and try to avoid). If the "ldconfig" stage may be skipped
when PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined then things get way too easier both
for default kernel linux.osrelease and default linux_base port change.

What do you think?


[1] Actually, I see only one reason to run it -- to test if it runs. ;-)


WBR
-- 
bsam