From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 20 19:02:05 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A25573A
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:02:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-x232.google.com (mail-la0-x232.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::232])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C6E297A
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:02:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lams18 with SMTP id s18so8018323lam.11
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:02:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=2n6Qmkb2PPCllSXVp0F59VTm6eWzZ3kpmu/viRg0ApA=;
 b=JB6QJCw0jNMm/E6z94gW2TpMef1GKaDeyRmYJVWXUtnRGo02grk2HJKbt4gjGVL9HC
 JwrSyaK3AdxiOzhIjpSUe2kBeuDHfBiPv0WPZP0ZH3UwG4u9CFoBMLbwDrzd2WZ1vvyU
 FPbcRycUw+ZCBB262/UpYIwSAPXVdGAXf2jsTcxA+ACMY9WDgWRAI56EYs5Yk/FwQKyf
 THI4jdkf0CEi0WpM44XZFGjFQGJzeEMM7o+Q0zHI5x7flyuwcSJKwyn6DVzSgtDOkto4
 lakr7mZd4cw3pkaU1EjD9TLxVSPDIa0TOe1itT93FyYOqabIVeF8rDKkT12CuV1xkV2L
 EB+Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.135.196 with SMTP id pu4mr9622025lbb.41.1424458922690;
 Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:02:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.78.131 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:02:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54E76B47.8080907@gmail.com>
References: <mailman.79.1423742401.43777.freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
 <54DCB8F2.5090809@gmail.com>
 <CAFOYbckKJWWQWVbaM0j+enB__du-YcgDh_YjWsA9364o339BUA@mail.gmail.com>
 <54E76B47.8080907@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:02:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFMmRNySk6tkPtt4GX_0WvU5a2M9roo_SydZkUxzruA0JrXmTw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.1: Intel dual port 10GbE card (82599EB) second port
 not present?
From: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>
To: John Jasen <jjasen@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:02:05 -0000

I think that you might be a bit confused about the behaviour.  An ix
port will only be missing if

a) You have a non-Intel SFP+ installed
b) hw.ix.unsupported_sfp=1 is not set in loader.conf

ix ports that have no SFP+ installed do show up in ifconfig