From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 24 00:05:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727E016A4CE for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:05:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA3743D3F for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:05:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9371551310; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:09:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:09:23 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <20041124000923.GA83230@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041123221629.GE56261@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041123231936.GA18847@ns1.xcllnt.net> <20041123233407.GA73561@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041123235854.GA19517@ns1.xcllnt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041123235854.GA19517@ns1.xcllnt.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: x11@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: [ports-ia64@pointyhat.freebsd.org: xorg-fonts-type1-6.7.0 failed on ia64 6] X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:05:15 -0000 --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 03:58:54PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 03:34:07PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >=20 > > > I built xorg just yesterday on my -current ia64. No problems. > > > Can you check if the port was built on pluto1 or pluto2? > >=20 > > xorg-clients was built on pluto2. >=20 > Ok, thanks. >=20 > > > pluto1 runs 5.3-stable, whereas pluto2 runs 6-current. I think > > > a 6-current chroot on a 5.3-stable machine is not a good idea > > > and a 5.3-stable chroot on a 6-current machine is questionable. > >=20 > > Unless there are ia64-specific incompatibilities or bugs, going both > > ways should be fine at the moment, and in particular it shouldn't > > matter whether the package was compiled under a 6.x kernel or a 5.x > > kernel as long as the userland is the same. >=20 > There's nothing ia64 specific, but there are various generic changes > that possibly affect ports. Enough to make me feel uncomfortable to > mix and match and why I have one on -stable and the other on -current. Unfortunately, if you're correct that makes both 5.x and 6.x package builds endangered. > > There's the usual instability on pluto* though, so perhaps the package > > was affected by some form of data corruption during the build. >=20 > Yes, possible. I'm building xorg on pluto2 as we speak. It's > probably a fluke however... Kris --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBo9EzWry0BWjoQKURAg5jAKDJEt0T8sJrU5DVRd0aE6yBa5Pi3gCgrROk BRw7RIa1Qei9WQiGw5n367A= =nZof -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ--