From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 13 12:30:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9EEDD3 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B88688FC16 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TYFd7-0003yQ-7I for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 04:30:13 -0800 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 04:30:13 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1352809813219-5760566.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <20121113120427.GE96846@e-new.0x20.net> References: <20121113104511.GA2362@cs.uni-bonn.de> <20121113120427.GE96846@e-new.0x20.net> Subject: Re: Unified BSD? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:30:15 -0000 mksh is certainly not, and I use it daily on FreeBSD and really like it. The same I could say about openntpd from OpenBSD. Isn't it like it should be then? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Unified-BSD-tp5760356p5760566.html Sent from the freebsd-chat mailing list archive at Nabble.com.