From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Jul 17 13:10:31 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA14952
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 13:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silver.sms.fi (root@silver.sms.fi [194.111.122.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA14941
          for <questions@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 13:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from pete@localhost) by silver.sms.fi (8.7.5/8.6.9) id XAA05361; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 23:09:41 +0300 (EET DST)
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 23:09:41 +0300 (EET DST)
Message-Id: <199607172009.XAA05361@silver.sms.fi>
From: Petri Helenius <pete@sms.fi>
To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu
Cc: "Ran d'Adi" <ran@styx.aic.net>, questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: olwm
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960708000507.221J-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>
References: <199607071740.VAA02884@styx.aic.net>
	<Pine.BSF.3.91.960708000507.221J-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Doug White writes:
 > 
 > olwm doesn't support 16 bit mode then.  There are several apps that don't 
 > like 16 bit mode (vic, for instance); it's not uncommon.
 > 
For vic this is not true any longer. 2.7b3 onward supports 16bpp.

Pete