From owner-freebsd-database@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 2 18:25:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-database@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-database@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F258D16A406 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 18:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoine@nagafix.co.uk) Received: from mail.nagafix.co.uk (mail.nagafix.co.uk [194.145.196.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB0E13C458 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 18:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoine@nagafix.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.0.6] (82-45-252-239.cable.ubr02.camd.blueyonder.co.uk [82.45.252.239]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: antoine@nagafix.co.uk) by mail.nagafix.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECED43B43 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 19:24:58 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4638D779.2070700@nagafix.co.uk> Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 19:24:57 +0100 From: Antoine Martin User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070304) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-database@freebsd.org References: 4635B9B4.3060905@nagafix.co.uk X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.3.0 OpenPGP: id=F18AD6BB; url=http://users.nagafix.co.uk/~antoine/antoine.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD database performance via JDBC X-BeenThere: freebsd-database@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Database use and development under FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 18:25:00 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 >> I published this paper a few weeks ago that some of you might find >> interesting (see part2: FreeBSD vs Linux vs Solaris): >> http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/ >> I have to admit I have been a Linux user for many years and I was >> expecting it to come out on top, and if anything I expected Solaris >> to do better - after all the tests are written in Java. All my >> predictions >> turned out wrong! >> Feel free to forward to [advocacy], re-use the graphs, etc. > Can you try it again with libthr threading library > http://threads.seas.gwu.edu/cgi-bin/man2web?program=libmap.conf§ion=5? > There's intent to make libthr the default for 7.0 and it may perform > worse in exactly this kind of benchmarks. You can run the benchmarks yourself, see: http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/DIY/ It's as simple as running this from the top: ant -f test.xml junit.dbperf -Ddatabase=db-connection (but it won't generate the pretty graphics) I'll certainly put it on my todo list, but I can't guarantee when it will get done... - just looking at the todo list is on the list ;) Cheers Antoine PS: not subscribed to this list, so please CC me. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGONd5GK2zHPGK1rsRCuNnAJ9UT4YxcVtwUUkoEFC3FB8/VHyDeQCfclBq eDxd6K1nxBjakVVAOVi4kwI= =dQoJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----