From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 22 10:08:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0707716A4B3 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6F443FDF for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:08:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (37.80-203-228.nextgentel.com [80.203.228.37]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAD279226; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:05:09 +0200 (MEST) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 74DAF9ADE0; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:05:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dwp.des.no (dwp.des.no [10.0.0.4]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 9DC699ADC8; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:05:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 829ADB84A; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:05:05 +0200 (CEST) To: Brad Knowles References: <20030922104213.L335@www.bluecirclesoft.com> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:05:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Brad Knowles's message of "Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:14:53 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=8.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: Marc Ramirez cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What are people using for MUA's nowadays? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:08:16 -0000 Brad Knowles writes: > On the CLI side, you can use SpamAssassin with procmail, and > mutt will work well (although pine would probably also work). If > you're doing anything related to PGP, I think mutt would be a better > choice, since it was designed (by Mike Elkins, the author of the > PGP/MIME RFC) to integrate those kinds of features from Day One. Mutt > has always worked well as a POP3 client, but used to have poor support > for IMAP. I don't know if that has since changed. Mutt has had more than adequate IMAP support for quite a while now. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no