From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Aug 15 21:31:33 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0767714BD0; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 21:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA37322;
	Sun, 15 Aug 1999 22:31:04 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA27173; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 22:31:37 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199908160431.WAA27173@harmony.village.org>
To: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Q: Extending the sysctl MIB for Linuxulator variables 
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>,
	Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 15 Aug 1999 13:16:03 EDT."
		<Pine.BSF.4.10.9908151314510.80813-100000@janus.syracuse.net> 
References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908151314510.80813-100000@janus.syracuse.net>  
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1999 22:31:37 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908151314510.80813-100000@janus.syracuse.net> "Brian F. Feldman" writes:
: I suppose, but wouldn't the proper place be under machdep? I agree that
: a linux top-level MIB would be easiest to remember.

Linux isn't machdep.  It is MI since we could have Linux/Alpha or
Linux/MIPS emulators...

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message