From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 12 14:05:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C19416A406 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:05:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [64.129.166.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFD513C4B6 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:05:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.177.171.220] ([10.177.171.220]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1CE4snS083767; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:04:54 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <45D07407.500@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:04:55 -0600 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070204) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian FREISLICH References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/2557/Mon Feb 12 04:23:49 2007 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on mh1.centtech.com Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem building various ports (dependencies). X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:05:03 -0000 On 02/12/07 02:42, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > Eric Anderson wrote: >>> Is the problem with the way the ports collection detects the existence >>> of dependencies or with the way the dependencies are installed? >> I'm guessing it's the removal of objformat from the tree. You can try >> to grab the pre-removal version, and compile/install it. This helped me >> build my ports again. Painful. > > Hmm. That would be it. Seems like it's been threatened for a long time. > > ---------------------------- > revision 1.19 > date: 2007/01/25 22:26:41; author: peter; state: dead; lines: +1 -1 > Retire objformat(1) as threatened in 2002. > > Ian Yep. I'm no ports guru, but seems like prior to whacking this, a quick burn through the ports should have been done. Not sure if it's happening now or not, but I just put objformat back to move on.. Eric