From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Nov 14 14: 4:13 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from peak.mountin.net (peak.mountin.net [207.227.119.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7809137B479; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by peak.mountin.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA21665;
	Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:03:57 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from jeff-ml@mountin.net)
Received: from dial-110.max1.wa.cyberlynk.net(207.227.118.110) by peak.mountin.net via smap (V1.3)
	id sma021663; Tue Nov 14 16:03:42 2000
Message-Id: <4.3.2.20001114155102.00c23150@207.227.119.2>
X-Sender: jeff-ml@207.227.119.2
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:03:19 -0600
To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG,
	Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>
From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <jeff-ml@mountin.net>
Subject: Re: libc shlib version (consensus?)
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <20001113152610.C39667@dragon.nuxi.com>
References: <vqc3dgvmpz2.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
 <31309.974061923@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
 <200011130413.eAD4DKj41211@vashon.polstra.com>
 <vqcd7g09vtq.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
 <200011131605.eADG5H342237@vashon.polstra.com>
 <20001113095036.C38290@dragon.nuxi.com>
 <vqc3dgvmpz2.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

At 03:26 PM 11/13/00 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:06:41PM -0800, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami 
>wrote:
> >  * I'm going to go ahead and bump -current's libc today in preparation of
> >  * doing in -stable if it comes down to it.  I know Garret has been waiting
> >  * to make some changes that would need a bump anyway.  So it won't be
> >  * wasted.
> >
> > Can you commit the change RSN?  I need a new snap with the updated
> > version numbers before I can even start rebuilding the packages.  We
> > are in a race against time now.
> >
> > What's the holdup?
>
>Root canal crown prep and make world time. :-)

Sorry to hear. <sudder>


Is the bump going to happen before 4.2 or not?

I *do* realize what  PITA this is.  Though for some it is an opportunity, 
as they can make changes to -current that would require a version bump.  Of 
course if the those changes can be MFC'd then we are in the same boat down 
the line at some point and -current must be then bumped before -stable can 
again be bumped.  And another compat distribution.  8-/

Main concern is the looming release date 6 days.  Would rather see this 
done right and delay the release past the 20th.


Jeff Mountin - jeff@mountin.net
Systems/Network Administrator
FreeBSD - the power to serve



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message