From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Sep 11 08:32:05 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id IAA24663
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 08:32:05 -0700
Received: from mramirez.sy.yale.edu (mramirez.sy.yale.edu [130.132.57.207])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA24657
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 08:32:03 -0700
Received: (from mrami@localhost) by mramirez.sy.yale.edu (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA17196; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 11:32:00 -0400
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 11:31:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Marc Ramirez <mrami@mramirez.sy.yale.edu>
Reply-To: mrami@minerva.cis.yale.edu
To: David Anderson <partek@indecent.com>
cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cons25 and vt100
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950910233017.192A-100000@system1.indecent.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950911112928.14556A-100000@mramirez.sy.yale.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 11 Sep 1995, David Anderson wrote:

> What is a reasonable
> termcap to use on remote systems that don't have cons25 since vt100
> doesn't work?

A term setting of 'ansi' should work fine.  I believe it is supposed to 
be compatible with the SCO console, so if you have a termcap for that, 
that should also work.

Marc.