From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Mar 25 18:01:49 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315AF5C6A47 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F5tGN3MCjz4SgF for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:01:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) by bucksport.safeport.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 12PI1nnX072560; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:01:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:01:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Doug Denault To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Xorg/Lenovo/drm revisited In-Reply-To: <20210325171313.95c9f4a47431cf24d87926aa@sohara.org> Message-ID: References: <20210325171313.95c9f4a47431cf24d87926aa@sohara.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:01:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4F5tGN3MCjz4SgF X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of doug@safeport.com designates 198.74.231.101 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=doug@safeport.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[198.74.231.101:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:198.74.231.101]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[safeport.com]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[198.74.231.101:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11288, ipnet:198.74.228.0/22, country:US]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:01:49 -0000 On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:55:46 -0400 (EDT) > Doug Denault wrote: > >> None of these systems recognize double-click as paste in xterm or on the >> xfce desktop. The latter is almost irrelevant as that is supposed to list >> all windows on all desktops (I have 8). Having to drop the mouse and do >> shift-insert is annoying but almost a "who cares". > > I've always (some decades now) used middle button for paste in X11, > double click selects a word IME. That acutally might explain #2. The mouse I am using as are all the usb one's I have are at least 10, maybe 15 years old, no three buttons here. For these guys double-click has always meant paste. Not supporting legacy stuff may be the norm these days. _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277