From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 31 11:33:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1569316A4CE for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 11:33:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [66.127.85.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D0D43D45 for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 11:33:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from 66.127.85.91 ([66.127.85.91]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBVJXRHQ058869 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 31 Dec 2003 11:33:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) From: Sam Leffler Organization: Errno Consulting To: Randy Bush Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 11:37:13 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200312311052.37526.sam@errno.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312311137.13738.sam@errno.com> cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: ath Ierrs X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 19:33:31 -0000 On Wednesday 31 December 2003 11:20 am, Randy Bush wrote: > >> # athstats > >> 4 tx management frames > >> 12 tx frames discarded prior to association > >> 10 short on-chip tx retries > >> 233 rx failed 'cuz of bad CRC > >> 30 periodic calibrations > >> 575 rate control checks > >> > >> # netstat -ni > >> # netstat -in > >> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs > >> Coll em0 1500 00:0d:60:3b:5c:df 0 0 0 > >> 0 0 ath0 1500 00:05:4e:41:ee:cd 48705 3768 51091 > >> 0 0 ^^^^ > >> ath0 1500 192.168.0 192.168.0.10 48177 - 51033 - > >> - lo0 16384 24314 0 24314 0 > >> 0 lo0 16384 127 127.0.0.1 24314 - 24314 - > >> - vmnet 1500 00:bd:d8:2a:00:01 0 0 1 > >> 0 0 vmnet 1500 192.168.254 192.168.254.1 0 - 0 > >> - - > > > > I see nothing unusual here. > > how about anything ungood? > > i did not expect rx crcs. should i consider them normal? > Yes. > in the same environment, it was exceedingly rare to get any > errors with a different laptop running 4.9-stable and an > orinoco wi card. The wi card likely did not report them to the host. Sam