From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 16 21: 3:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C3D37B404 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 21:03:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org ([12.233.149.189]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020117050321.DPTM10199.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@bmah.dyndns.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 05:03:21 +0000 Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0H53KZ15935; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 21:03:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200201170503.g0H53KZ15935@bmah.dyndns.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Thomas Seck Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: what's vnlru? In-reply-to: <20020116135318.GA427@laurel.seck.home> References: <200201151618468.SM01176@141.com> <200201160101.g0G117r64693@apollo.backplane.com> <20020116104904.A2800@shikima.mine.nu> <20020116135318.GA427@laurel.seck.home> Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Seck message dated "Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:53:18 +0100." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 21:03:20 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If memory serves me right, Thomas Seck wrote: > # Rasputin (rasputin@submonkey.net): > > [vnlru] > > > Thansk for the overview - it's not a performance issue, I just checked > > another fairly recent (4.5 pre) BSD box and didn't see it, > > so thought I'd better check it out. > > > > [ Is this the sort of thing that should go into UPDATING? ] No. UPDATING is for issues that could pose particular obstacles to people upgrading, not for documenting general changes. > I'd vote for a short description in the release notes (I did not > overlook them for a few months, so I do not know whether Bruce Mah > picked it up already). I'm working on it, thanks in part to dillon's recent post here. (It's weird seeing people mention me in random threads!) Cheers, Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message