From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 25 22:43:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537B7106566B for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 22:43:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from ifdnrg30.ifdnrg.com (ifdnrg30.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F9B8FC1B for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 22:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.114] (188-221-77-161.zone12.bethere.co.uk [188.221.77.161]) (authenticated bits=0) by ifdnrg30.ifdnrg.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6PMhD1I089705 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:43:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Message-ID: <50107683.4050403@ifdnrg.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:43:15 +0100 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD References: <500FD659.4090106@my.gd> <20120725081328.2a4c66e7@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120725081328.2a4c66e7@scorpio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stable production version. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 22:43:23 -0000 On 25/07/2012 13:13, Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:19:53 +0200 > Damien Fleuriot articulated: > >> I'd say it's a matter of personal preference. >> >> We're mostly running 8.3 in production here. >> >> I've recently installed 9-STABLE servers to try them out and fill PRs >> if I get problems. >> >> I would encourage you to use 9-STABLE so that you may do the same and >> ensure the stability of future releases. > I would agree with that philosophy up to a point. It is definitely a > matter of personal preference; however, for myself, I NEVER install > version X.0 of any software if said software is to be used in a mission > critical situation. I always wait until X.1 is released. If possible in > your case, would it be feasible to wait until 9.1 is released? You > can gather some info on it here: > . As usual, any > correlation between the expected release date and the actual date is > purely coincidental. Just my 2ยข on the matter. > not disagreeing per se..but just a reminder that with the excellent freebsd-update you get updates to 9.0 quickly ( i hadn't realised there was 61 already) from a new install earlier tonight Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. Fetching 61 patches.....10....20....30....40....50....60 done. Paul.