From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 28 12:17:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8215416AB5F for ; Sun, 28 May 2006 12:17:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1084143D4C for ; Sun, 28 May 2006 12:17:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 6157 invoked from network); 28 May 2006 22:17:40 +1000 Received: from 203-217-63-189.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.217.63.189) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 28 May 2006 22:17:40 +1000 Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 22:17:36 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20060528221736.56489f7e@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060527204339.R1114@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060524004530.37df6b39@localhost> <20060527204339.R1114@ganymede.hub.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: diablo-jdk vs jdk1.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 12:17:54 -0000 On Sat, 27 May 2006 20:44:51 -0300 (ADT) "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > On Wed, 24 May 2006, Norberto Meijome wrote: > > > Hi all, > > 2 questions re. JDK 1.5 : > > - is .15 considered now stable? ( I remember reading that it was still > > considered alpha quality, but i cant see that notice anymore). > > > > - re. diablo-jdk : Other than the obvious advange of precompiled package > > (already done for me, SUN certified) , is there other advantage to using > > diablo-jdk instead of building my own? > > And, in the same vein, any caveats I should keep in mind when using > > diablo-jdk instead of jdk-1.5? > > My understanding is that the precompiled package performs better then the > one you build from ports, *but* ... I don't know why ... > > On my 6-STABLE machine, to get Azureus to work properly, I had to add the > following to /etc/libmap.conf: > > [/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/] > libpthread.so libc_r.so > libpthread.so.2 libc_r.so.6 > > else it just didn't work ... > > Beyond that, I've been using the precompiled one and been most happy with > it ... thanks - i've been using for a few days diablo-jdk with no problems this far. I reinstalled all my java programs after changing from jdk-1.4 to diablo-jdk-1.5... i dont remember having to change libmap for azureus... but I have added : ## diablo-jdk libz.so.2 libz.so.3 libpthread.so.1 libpthread.so libc.so.5 libc.so.6 libm.so.3 libm.so libstdc++.so.4 libstdc++.so I think it may have been for 'java'