From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 27 4:38:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from apoq.skynet.be (apoq.skynet.be [195.238.2.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BA137B84E for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 04:38:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by apoq.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DD71F3D6; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:38:19 +0200 (MET DST) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200004270502.NAA29330@ugly.prth.tensor.pgs.com> References: <200004270502.NAA29330@ugly.prth.tensor.pgs.com> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:38:07 +0200 To: Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS SPS Perth , current@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: DEVFS - what's happening with it? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 1:02 PM +0800 2000/4/27, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS SPS Perth wrote: > Haven't seen any discussion for quite some time. The Linux people seem to be > getting into a lather about it as well. Rehashing the issues like device > persistence, et cetera. Yeah, there's a really fascinating summary of a whole lot of things happening for kernel 2.4 at , including the devfs and procfs stuff. -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message