From owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 27 03:03:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230571065676 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:03:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@miralink.com) Received: from plato.miralink.com (mail.miralink.com [70.103.185.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D248A8FC19 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:03:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@miralink.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by plato.miralink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCA61A917E; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:54:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.399 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.399 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from plato.miralink.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (plato.miralink.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bNYthq367tvK; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:54:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.47.1.6] (vpn.office.miralink.com [10.0.0.5]) by plato.miralink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2011A917B; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:54:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48B4C407.9010900@miralink.com> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:03:35 -0700 From: Sean Bruno User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dieter References: <200808270031.AAA13884@sopwith.solgatos.com> In-Reply-To: <200808270031.AAA13884@sopwith.solgatos.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Something broke :-( Re: fwcontrol update X-BeenThere: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Firewire support in FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:03:40 -0000 Dieter wrote: >>>> Can you run a live linux distro(unbuntu or knoppix) and see if linux can >>>> "reset" >>>> your NEC f/w controller? >>>> > > What does penguinix call firewire? > > (none):~ # dmesg | grep -i fire > (none):~ # dmesg | grep -i fw > (none):~ # dmesg | grep -i 1394 > (none):~ # dmesg | grep -i link > audit: initializing netlink socket (disabled) > eth0: RXcsums[1] LinkChgREG[0] MIirq[0] ASF[0] Split[0] WireSpeed[1] TSOcap[1] > > (none):~ # man -k fire > fire: nothing appropriate. > (none):~ # man -k fw > fw: nothing appropriate. > (none):~ # man -k 1394 > 1394: nothing appropriate. > (none):~ # man -k link > link: nothing appropriate. > > I was hoping that you could boot linux, and then plugin your camera and see what the output of dmesg and /var/log/messages has to say. > Anyway, due to a firmware bug I ended up having to power cycle > the machine. (switched off at the P/S, so even 5V standby should > have been off) > > I was expecting the power cycle to completely reset the NEC board. > But it is not back to normal. I no longer get the spewage from a > constant series of bus resets, but fwcontrol -R still doesn't work. > > fwcontrol_prev is from March, and used to do -R successfully. > > fwcontrol_prev -R /dv0/test_prev_camera.dv > Detected DV format on input. > (EAGAIN) > (EAGAIN) > (EAGAIN) > > Is there any chance that you overwrote fwcontrol_prev with my patched version? Could you pull fwcontrol from src and recompile just to check? -- Sean Bruno MiraLink Corporation 6015 NE 80th Ave, Ste 100 Portland, OR 97218 Cell 503-358-6832 Phone 503-621-5143 Fax 503-621-5199 MSN: sbruno@miralink.com Google: seanwbruno@gmail.com