From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Dec  3 15:27:21 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id PAA03852
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 3 Dec 1995 15:27:21 -0800
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id PAA03846
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 3 Dec 1995 15:27:07 -0800
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA18185
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5 for hackers@freebsd.org); Sun, 3 Dec 1995 16:29:20 -0600
Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA20614 for hackers@freebsd.org; Sun, 3 Dec 1995 15:11:04 -0600
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 1995 15:11:04 -0600
From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
Message-Id: <199512032111.PAA20614@bonkers.taronga.com>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: panic: free vnode isn't
References: <199511210234.NAA23764@godzilla.zeta.org.au> <Pine.BSF.3.91.951120220426.25338W-100000@flinch>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Brian Tao  <taob@io.org> wrote:
>    Would changing MAXUPRC be better then?  Calling ulimit or
>setrlimit before each process isn't really practical.

Seems to me the place to do this would be in a wrapper around inetd or
getty as the case may be.