From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 16 17:32:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F183837B; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x22e.google.com (ie-in-x022e.1e100.net [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C933DA; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id k10so5895076iea.5 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:32:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vceJZnuDoNDbjswYTTDZ9ugm51aEkok5c4lbH0dBju4=; b=d0dzXSJ0nyui1UJ1QO02/TQlQhFigH41RDdBbzCbxwDKpToVDUWt2q6cq4Ximy7s10 NnN5QMp99sVnDnLd703iNmfyPzKEfW8BPxKtNezBlc5WGNYMK/OqbG6qdpNRnKWm6eyQ 0z+PvSBvBXsQCnphhQGFCNnC7aJXXwCm7+P6fQAAAOXvp9vMsqolWkEbqdJ24C2EFsQW e/+28ekKMHjInB3xhoeVVAmM5Lo/nkz9aOFJH/BHRzj4hqjQFiSmQ1kRG8sLRJ0tV/CB mhGh6tR4YjtlJNWOK1EZwJUrEYGoZT6cXW1cXFPAD+cS5vaXRSeDx2SJ45ISk5sHYxtB ejHQ== X-Received: by 10.42.88.145 with SMTP id c17mr3588911icm.47.1361035935177; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:32:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.63.12 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:31:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <51125F9D.3080705@freebsd.org> References: <510EDC14.3030107@freebsd.org> <1359939844.51356.YahooMailNeo@web162003.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <510F5352.8000101@bsdforen.de> <51101544.3070809@passap.ru> <5111C78D.1080901@bsdforen.de> <51125F9D.3080705@freebsd.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:31:45 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: In36Vd6CSt7KdvOa-gmTlh74XRo Message-ID: Subject: Re: New version of TeX? To: Nathan Whitehorn , Hiroki Sato Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:32:16 -0000 On 6 February 2013 13:50, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 02/05/13 21:01, Dominic Fandrey wrote: >> On 04/02/2013 21:08, Boris Samorodov wrote: >>> 04.02.2013 10:21, Dominic Fandrey =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >>>> On 04/02/2013 02:04, Danilo Egea wrote: >>>>> Well, there is this project http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/ >>>> >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/171571 >>> >>> I use the patch from this PR together with the attached diff >>> and portmaster seems to DTRT with dependencies. >> >> Seeing that someone else actually uses it, I just attached a little >> update fixing a problem I discovered only a couple of days ago. I >> recommend you to install texlive-base again. >> >> Also I think it would be nice if you attached your patches to the PR. >> >> Regards >> > > Is there any chance this could be committed now pending a longer-term > rearchitecture of the TeX stuff? I just installed it on three machines > (thanks!) with no trouble at all and everything is working perfectly. > Waiting for some long-term solution seems to be making the perfect the > enemy of the good -- and this Friday will mark 8 years since the last > teTeX update. I would very much like to put Dominic's version in (for no particular reason other than simplicity, and it was the first I looked at-- I can't see any major advantage of one over the other). Hiroki-san, can we please move this forward? I'm happy to test and commit this one. If the worst comes to the worst, we could have alternative TeXLive ports accompanied by a USE_LATEX knob and bsd.latex.mk.... Chris