From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Feb 12 14:28:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dsl-64-193-218-89.telocity.com (dsl-64-193-218-89.telocity.com [64.193.218.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CBE837B4EC for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:28:47 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 19472 invoked by uid 1000); 12 Feb 2001 22:25:52 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:25:51 -0600 From: Lucas Bergman To: "Kasper (swebase)" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipnat problems. Message-ID: <20010212162551.B3118@billygoat.slb.to> Reply-To: lucas@slb.to References: <015b01c0953c$5909e150$425c4bd4@swebasekasper> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <015b01c0953c$5909e150$425c4bd4@swebasekasper>; from kasper@swebase.com on Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 10:39:57PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I get this problem the whole time on my screen, anyone who has a > nice solution out there? > > Feb 13 21:09:01 mrtg /kernel: arp: 212.44.44.44 is on vr5 but got > reply from 00:50:ba:e9:12:13 on vr3 > > [ad nauseum] It's impossible to tell without knowing your network topology, but maybe one or more netmasks or addresses are set wrong on your interfaces. Or, possibly, one of your clients has an address set wrong. For an example, suppose I have two interfaces zz0 and zz1, and I do # ifconfig zz0 inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xfffffff0 # ifconfig zz1 inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 In other words, zz0 is connected to the four-bit network consisting of 192.168.0.n for 0 <= n < 16, and zz1 is connected to an 8-bit network that does not intersect the first. If a packet from, say, 192.168.0.2 comes in on zz1, you'll get a diagnostic like the above, since one expects that to be on the network connected to zz0. Lucas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message