From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 28 00:08:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9CF16A41F; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:08:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from www.cryptography.com (li-22.members.linode.com [64.5.53.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA80643D45; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:08:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from [10.0.0.33] (adsl-67-119-74-222.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [67.119.74.222]) by www.cryptography.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j9S08cxq024183 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:08:40 -0700 Message-ID: <43616BFF.1040709@root.org> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:08:31 -0700 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jung-uk Kim References: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E0323D7B6@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> <435928CA.1010305@root.org> <55E0CA58-AC1E-48E4-A4D0-DDC5829D3690@yahoo.fr> <200510271744.17558.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200510271744.17558.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org, Mathieu Prevot Subject: Re: ACPI errors on amd64 (sempron) X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:08:46 -0000 Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Thursday 27 October 2005 05:39 pm, Mathieu Prevot wrote: > >>I simply added >> >>#define ACPI_MISALIGNED_TRANSFERS >> >>in /usr/src/sys/amd64/include/acpica_machdep.h so the intel >>actypes.h is preserved. >>Maybe it is simpler than touching the Robert's / Intel's code. Is >>it right ? >>If so, someone have to commit it on the CVS sources. Can you do it >>before the release ? > > > It's already fixed in (soon to be imported) ACPICA-20051021 code. There's no way we can get acpi-ca tested in -current and MFC'd before 6.0. Instead, we should MFC just the logic Intel changed in the header file to 6.0. -- Nate