From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 29 10:26:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B99B4FB for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:26:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D3728B2 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk (storm.tdx.co.uk [62.13.130.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/) with ESMTP id r7TAQtC0035682 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:26:56 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:26:55 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Snapshots with 'disk and memory' take a very long time? / calcru: runtime went backwards Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1958E3417C6A3D217AEC0451@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> References: <1958E3417C6A3D217AEC0451@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:26:57 -0000 --On 29 August 2013 11:13 +0100 Karl Pielorz wrote: > Also once the snapshot is complete the console starts filling with lots > of: > > " > calcru: runtime went backwards from 752 usec to 717 usec for pid X > " > > (Lots of values for 'from' and 'to' and lots, i.e. all PID's). > > Restarting the VM fixes this. As does just 'leaving' the system as well - having done it a few times now to test, the calcru errors do stop being issued after a while. I don't know if their cosmetic (can be ignored) or not though. -Karl